The Stormwater Blogs

More from this blogger

Stormwater Editor's Blog

  • RSS
  • Save
  • Print
  • Email
Monday, September 27, 2010 8:00 PM

Capturing Mercury

By: Kaspersen, Janice: Stormwater Editor Comments

Pollutants from common sources, including some intended to make our lives better, are ending up in our waterways. Recent government efforts are aimed at reducing two of these: contamination from prescription and non-prescription drugs, and mercury from dental fillings.

Last Saturday, the US Drug Enforcement Agency, with support from the USEPA, sponsored “take-back events” for prescription and over-the-counter drugs at 1,700 sites around the country.  Many unused drugs are disposed of improperly and end up in surface waters and even drinking water supplies, as explored in this May 2010 Stormwater article.

This week, the EPA is announcing a proposed rule to reduce mercury that enters the environment from dental offices. It’s estimated that 3.7 tons of mercury comes from dental offices annually, when older fillings containing mercury are replaced. A lot of the substance is simply flushed down the drain, eventually ending up in wastewater treatment plants and in surface water systems. Roughly half of the mercury reaching wastewater treatment plants comes from dental waste.

Although there has been some debate, it’s generally accepted that the older fillings don’t pose much hazard while they’re in place; it’s once they’re removed that the problems begin. Once in rivers and lakes, the mercury can enter the food chain when microorganisms convert it to methylmercury, the bioavailable form. Eaten by fish and shellfish and eventually by humans, mercury can cause damage to the brain and nervous system, especially in children.

The proposed rule would require the use of amalgam separators, which can remove about 95% of the mercury that would otherwise reach wastewater treatment plants. The rule is expected to be final by 2012, but until then EPA is encouraging dental offices to voluntarily install amalgam separators—already required by some cities and 12 states.

What Do You Think?

 

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Note from the Editor: The content that appears in our "Comments" section is supplied to us by outside, third-party readers, and organizations and does not necessarily reflect the view of our staff or Forester Media—in fact, we may not agree with it—and we do not endorse, warrant, or otherwise take responsibility for any content supplied by third parties that appear on our website. All comments are subject to approval.

CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:

 

Stormwater Email Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our email newsletter!